On Sunday, i.e, 11th September, 2015, all newspapers were flush
with the news of Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement
Directorate raids at some of the branches of Bank of Baroda and many
other private properties. The reason:- around Rs 6172 crore were sent
from India to Hong Kong as advance
remittances for import of cashews, pulses and rice, but nothing was imported
and most of the firms remitting money from Ashok Vihar branch of BOB were
alleged to be fictitious. The ED has registered a case under sections of
Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The interesting aspect in this entire game is that the
institution (Bank of Baroda) do not suffer any financial loss (except
reputational loss), rather it profited by way of earning on commissions on such
remittances. But its employees will suffer financial, physical, mental and all
types of loses. The reason is simple-- banking is not like any other industry
wherein loss is suffered only by the promoters but in banks, since raw
material is public money, it becomes an onerous task for bankers to
upkeep the public trust.
Let's understand how banks are used for money laundering.
As per newspapers reports, in present instance, irregular transactions were
conducted by splitting large transactions into several smaller ones below $
100,000 to avoid reporting (FEMA allows up to $ 100,000 remittance for imports
without a Bill of Entry). Such structuring of transactions to avoid
reporting to regulatory or tax authorities is termed as 'structuring' or
'smurfing' in banking circles.
According to the United States Treasury Department, "Money
Laundering is the process of making illegally gained proceeds (i.e. "Dirty
money") appear legal (i.e. "Clean")."
Typically, it involves three steps: placement, layering and
integration. First, cash is introduced into the financial system by some means
("placement"). Then, the money is moved around to create confusion,
sometimes by wiring or transferring through numerous accounts
("layering"). Final step involves integrating this money into the
financial system through additional transactions until the "dirty
money" appear "clean".
In this entire complex mechanism, there is generally one link
which is fictitious. The real culprit deliberately keeps this fictitious link
to avoid being caught. In such situation, it becomes the utmost duty of bankers
to scrupulously comply with Know Your Customer ("KYC")
guidelines.
Secondly, relaxations given by the government are to
facilitate growth. Bankers should use their general prudence that no one
misuses the system. If imports up to $ 100,000 are exempted from submission of
Bill of Entry or other documents, bankers must ensure from other means that
imports have actually happened.
For banks, system compliance is equally important as
growth.
(The views expressed in
the article are merely for academic purpose and are not subscribed by the
organisation where the author is working)
Tilak Gulati,
Assistant General Manager, UCO Bank.
Author: www.itstrgulati.blogspot.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.